OpinionReady

Sample exchange

Real people.
Every one on the record.

Buyers describe an audience, panel owners supply it, and both sides read the same record of what was delivered and what was removed. The rejection log is not a report produced on request — it is how the two sides agree on what actually happened.

How the exchange works:

Feasibility, counted not guessed

Incidence is measured against stored profile data from our 250,000-member proprietary panel, then quoted with a price, a date and the sourcing mix behind it.

Screening before field, not after

Identity, device and network checks run through Verisoul before an invitation is sent. Inattention is handled separately from fraud, the way the Insights Association defines it.

One record, both sides

Buyer file and supplier statement carry the same removals — the rule that fired, the observed value, the timestamp. Partner supply is labelled rather than blended away.

A sample delivery record: 97.9% verified, zero duplicates, median LOI 9m 41s, with per-respondent identity, device and panel-source checks

Panel book

What we can actually reach, and what we cannot

Every provider publishes a market count. This is the other half — the audiences where supply is thin, and the ones we will decline rather than quote. Indicative only while the panel is being built. Ask and we will tell you what is actually reachable this week.

Audience USUKDEFRJPBRIN
Consumer, nationally representative fills same week fills same week fills same week one week one week fills same week one week
Professionals, any level fills same week fills same week one week one week two weeks one week one week
IT decision-makers one week one week two weeks two weeks thin, ask first thin, ask first two weeks
Budget holders, 500+ employees two weeks two weeks thin, ask first thin, ask first not panel work not panel work thin, ask first
Clinicians and allied health two weeks two weeks thin, ask first not panel work not panel work not panel work thin, ask first
  • fills same week
  • one week
  • two weeks
  • thin, ask first
  • not panel work

Updated 2026-09-14 · Ask about an audience

Members of the OpinionReady panel

Real people, real opinions

Found, or kept

Most sample is found, not kept. Someone is recruited for a study, answers it, and is gone — so every project starts by discovering who these people are. Our members are profiled before a study exists, which is why incidence can be counted instead of estimated, and why the answer arrives in days rather than after a recruitment drive.

Profiling is asked a question or two at a time across weeks, never fifty at signup. People answer carefully when they are not rushing to reach the paid part, and asking the same attribute in different forms months apart is what makes a contradiction visible.

Being ready is only half of it. The other half is being real, and that is not something a panel should grade itself on. Every signup and study entry runs through Verisoul, an independent identity and fraud platform — not our own score marking our own homework.

  • Multi-accounting — accounts linked by device and behaviour, grouped rather than guessed at
  • Device and network risk — emulators, proxies and hosting ranges, with named reason codes
  • Bot detection — automated sessions caught at entry, not inferred afterwards from timing
  • Impossible travel — one account appearing in two places it could not have reached

How this fits our own checks

What teams actually bring us

Three shapes of work make up most of what we field. Each fails in a different way, so each is quoted and monitored differently.

Low-incidence B2B

A vendor sizing a new pricing tier

Infrastructure buyers with signature authority at companies over 500 people. Perhaps four in a hundred panellists qualify.

How it fails: not cost, but screener burn. An optimistic quote exhausts the qualifying population before quota fills, and the next wave has nowhere left to go.

How we quote low incidence

Interlocked consumer

A retailer testing three pack designs

National representation on age, gender and region is easy to hit on each dimension separately and easy to miss on all three at once.

How it fails: weeks later, in analysis. A subgroup turns out to rest on nineteen people who all arrived within two hours from one source.

How we interlock quotas

Repeat rated tasks

A team rating model outputs weekly

Rated work needs the same people back week after week, with reliability tracked across sessions rather than judged inside any one of them.

How it fails: quietly. Raters not paid for sessions that go nowhere stop reading carefully, and the drift shows up as noise nobody can attribute.

How repeat fielding works

The deliverable nobody else sends

Why does our rejection rate get published?

Because a supplier who never reports removals is either not looking or not telling, and both are worse than a number that occasionally looks bad.

The log lists every respondent we took out of your file, the rule that removed them, the value that triggered it and when it fired. You can reconcile it line by line against your own counts, which is the only way to know whether quality meant anything on a given project.

The same applies to sourcing. Blended supply is normal in this industry and there is nothing wrong with it. Hiding the blend is what produces the surprises — a subgroup that will not replicate, a result that moves when you repeat the study elsewhere.

The full screening method

What the sample has to survive

Different objectives put pressure on different parts of a sample. These are the ones we are asked for most, and what each one actually demands.

Brand and campaign trackingWave-on-wave comparability. The same sourcing mix each wave, or the movement you measure is your supplier changing, not the market.
Concept and product testingNaivety. Respondents who have seen a similar concept recently are held out, because a second exposure is not a first reaction.
Pricing researchAttention. Van Westendorp and conjoint collapse under speeding, so timing thresholds are set per exercise rather than per survey.
Advertising effectivenessClean control cells. Exposed and unexposed groups have to be drawn the same way, or the lift is an artefact of recruitment.
UX and product researchReachability. Small, specific audiences needing targeted invitation rather than a broadcast that burns the panel.
AI evaluation and feedbackContinuity. The same raters across weeks, per-rater reliability visible, and fair payment for sessions that yield nothing.

Send an audience, not a brief

A one-line definition is enough to get a real answer. If it is not reachable from panel supply, we will say so rather than quote it and miss quota in week three. Cash out from $5 if you are joining as a participant instead.

Request a feasibility check

Method, written down

Everything a buyer would normally have to ask for in a call is already on this site.

  1. 01 Credentials Our ESOMAR 37 answers, in full Answered as a readable page rather than a PDF, including where the answer is that we do not do something
  2. 02 Quality Every check we run, and what each one misses Seven named checks with their blind spots stated, and why an appealable removal beats a rule that punishes honest members
  3. 03 Methodology How incidence gets quoted, and why quotes drift The formula, the staleness discount applied to old profile answers, and where in field we re-check it against reality
  4. 04 Panel Where members come from Three recruitment routes labelled on every delivery, and why profiling is spread over weeks instead of asked at signup